Re: Validation Issues....

by "Rayne Alburquerque" <rayneal(at)home.com>

 Date:  Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:10:11 -0600
 To:  "stephen.woodhead" <stephen.woodhead(at)tinyonline.co.uk>,
"HWG MAILING BASICS LIST" <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
 References:  default
  todo: View Thread, Original
I like your view, Josh. It makes perfect sense. Why fret about it, as long
as the pages work for the audience.

Rayne


----- Original Message -----
From: stephen.woodhead
To: HWG MAILING BASICS LIST
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Validation Issues....


RE:
> I was wondering if anyone here could assist me with a validation
> problem.
>
> I have a page that validated the last time I checked it.  I'm in the
> process of switching over to style sheets, and I decided to do an
> initial validation to see if I had removed all the FONT shrapnel and
> the like.  Well, my page doesn't validate, for a completely different
reason than I thought it would - my JavaScript code is boring it
> where it didn't before.
------------------------------------------------------

Dear Jen,

I have a site which works on IE and NN right down to versions 1.0 and 1.1
(I've tested it), which covers about 99.5% of browsers,
but It fails validation on over 150 lines! in fact Allaire's Home Site gave
up checking because of the number of validation violations.
My point is .........Who gives a damn !
If it works on the number and types of browsers you want it to work on then
that's it, you have achieved what you set out to achieve.
There is a quote and I can't remember who it is by, but goes something like
this ...............
"Rules and regulations are for the abeyance of idiots and the guidance of
wise men/women".
If it works, don't worry about it, your better off spending time on
something that really matters.

Please note, this is only a personal view, although I would like to know how
the rest of the list think about it.

Josh :0)

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA