Re: . . Publisher 2000

No. You are not a natural born ass, I am sure you have worked very hard at
it <j/k>. I have enjoyed your off the wall posts in the past and look
forward to more to come. Although I rarely post, I would have hoped that you
would have remembered my posts of earlier times when I too agreed to any
post you had made about the validator. I have them bookmarked front and
center and use them like a bible. Everyone and I mean _EVERYONE_ has good in
them. I appreciated your input. I used the validator and pointed my client
in that direction. My biggest concern at this point was in more of a caching
issue as the page was loading fine on other PCs. Just not on my network here
at my office or at my clients home. We have since narrowed the biggest
problem to our ISP (not our web host as that is me), for we use the same
company. Now we just need to figure out why it would point back to our ISP
and what to do about it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
To: "Kevin Bayley" <webmaster(at)prairienorth.com>; "Captain F.M. O'Lary"
<ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>; <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: . . Publisher 2000


> At 02:22 AM 6/15/02, Kevin Bayley wrote:
> >If you had read my original message more thoroughly you would notice that
I
> >do not require a quick trip to the validator. Every site I personally
build
> >validates. My original message clearly stated - "One of my clients is
using
> >said software to publish his site." Please. I do appreciate your input.
> >However I am a professional designer and my hair bristles anytime someone
> >even thinks of suggesting that I use software. I am a Notepad user. I
always
> >have been and I always will be. Thank you.
>
>
> Gosh Kevin. I didn't mean to ruffle your feathers! I was really actually
_trying_ to be polite. I don't even see where I said you were using
"software". Oh well, I guess I'm just a natural born ass.
>
>  . . . but if all that you say above is even close to true, why couldn't y
ou look at the code and see it was whacked? It was pretty obvious, pretty
much immediately, at least to my old worn out eyes.
>
> If your objective was to gather information to convince this client they
need to fix their files you should know you don't need this list. *All* you
need is a validator and a working knowledge of the WWW.
>
> I guess that means I COMPLETELY do not understand your post AT ALL then.
Oh well, I guess I'm just a natural born ass.
>
>  . . . Huuuummmmmm?
>
> Sorry list! - I ~do~ know better.
> Fuzzy.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Captain F.M. O'Lary
> ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net
> I live in my own little world, but it's ok, they know me here.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA