Re: XML?

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

 Date:  Tue, 09 Jan 2001 18:16:09 -0500
 To:  Gregor Pirnaver <gregor.pirnaver(at)email.si>,
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
 References:  canopy canopy2
  todo: View Thread, Original
At 11:46 PM 1/9/01 +0100, Gregor Pirnaver wrote:
>> It is my humble opinion that the developments we have
>> been discussing are pretty much going to mandate browser
>> detect scripts and dynamically generated pages.
>
>Content is also a problem, is it not?

Actually, you can include anything you would like in a dynamically
generated page. Text, graphics, forms . . . the works.

But I think I see what you are really getting at:

A regular sized page of text viewed three or four words at a time could
well be ~agonizing~ if you are using the devise because you are in a hurry
and need the info now.

Which seems to me like the reason you would own/use this devise in the
first place. Well, if you discount the "novelty" defense for owning one :-)

Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Another year ends.
All targets met. All systems working. All customers satisfied.
All staff eagerly enthusiastic. All pigs fed and ready to fly.
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA