Re: Naming files with .HTML vs. .HTM

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:19:58 -0500
To:	"Paul Wilson" <webgooru(at)gte.net>, "Maryanne Martin" <mmartin(at)Cerylion.com>, <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
References:	Cerylion
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 04:45 PM 2/5/01 -0500, Paul Wilson wrote:
>.HTML is the correct extension, although almost all hosting companies allow
>both.  Some insist that the "home page" be "./" and some NT sites
>insist on "default.htm" by way of retaliation.

Yea. Retaliation against the MAC web servers out there. Don't you know
Billy Boy wishes he could build a web server platform that compares to Web
Star!

:-)
Fuzzy
<don't get him started on MAC's [he's a closet Apple hugger]>
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
If we're not supposed to eat late-night snacks, why is there a light in the
refrigerator?
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA