Re: critique please

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Thu, 09 Aug 2001 06:12:20 -0500
To:	"Richard and Jolene Johnson" <jonric(at)tx3.net>, "Word Gallery" <jmjservant(at)yahoo.com>, "HWG Basics" <hwg-basics(at)mail.hwg.org>
References:	rachelsbrain
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 12:26 AM 8/9/01 , Richard and Jolene Johnson wrote:
[ . . .]
>I think that when it takes extra effort to have pages display adequately in
>all browsers, it is easy for people to convince themselves it isn't
>necessary.  I myself have chosen where to draw the battle lines on what I'm
>going to design for and what I'm not going to fret about.  And that might
>not be the same line that another person draws.
>
>Jolene

I have a question.

Judging ~strictly~ by the messages that cross this list on a daily basis it
is NOT opinion to say that designing for specific browsers is a LOT more
trouble than designing for all browsers (valid HTML).

Jolene, could you please explain your statement?

TIA,
Fuzzy.

______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
The great thing about living in a small town is when you don't know what
you're doing, someone else does.

------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA