RE: Small website design . . . DTD Modification
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
Date: |
Tue, 02 Oct 2001 13:01:09 -0400 |
To: |
<bjornvs(at)bvsenterprises.com>, <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
0 |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 11:56 AM 10/2/01 , Bjorn Van Simaeys wrote:
>Wrong!
>
>If I am not in compliance with W3, then how come the W3 validator validates
>*ALL* my pages as CORRECT HTML 4.01 transitional. According to W3, the
>additional URI is [optional], but not required. Can you give me the link to
>the page at W3.org that explicitly states that the second URI is obligated?
[ . . .]
All: I stand corrected.
Bjorn, you are *completely* correct, the 'additional' URI is indeed
OPTIONAL according to the W3.
Fuzzy
<suffering foot in mouth disease at the moment - but happy as heck about
learning something "new">
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net
I asked Mom if I was a gifted child... she said they certainly wouldn't
have paid for me.
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA