Re: [ . . ] demographic!<II>
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2001 10:18:29 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
toast bert toast2 |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 09:46 AM 12/16/01 , Kym Jones wrote:
>LOL fuzzy..heck, if you're selling a product that is "female" oriented,
>then you employ a design that will attract/keep the attention of
>women....if you're more geared toward's men, then your design is going to
>be more "masculine".
Wow. yea, when it the product is that cut and dried.
>
>Stands to reason and quite logical to me..but what do I know.
>
I know the feeling ;-).
>I really don't give a fig what the stats say as to which gender buys more
>over the broad realm of things....I want to attract who I want to attract
>...common sense ? ...
Definitely.
However (bet you knew that was coming), there are sooooooo many . . .
gender neutral . . . products and services out there to market!!
Real Estate for one. Holy Cow. The look and feel of a site could well make
or break it !
I think that is part of why we make the big bucks <belly laugh> we work the
magic. Figuring out whether to make that Real Estate site 'masculine' or
'feminine' *and being right* is, in my experience, magical.
:-)
Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net
"With computers, every morning is the dawn of a new error. "
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA