Re: usefulness of search erngines, was: need a nav column...

by Tamara Abbey <tamara(at)abbeyink.com>

 Date:  Fri, 15 Dec 2000 21:57:49 -0600
 To:  "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>,
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
 References:  home naisp
  todo: View Thread, Original
At 10:05 PM 12/15/00 -0500, Captain F.M. O'Lary wrote:
>" . . . fellow who mixes soap powder at home in his bath tub for sale to
>compete on an even playing field with the likes of Proctor and Gamble,
>because the search engines returned results based on relevance to search
>terms, rather than dollars invested in advertising."
>
>I guess *that* is out the window now.


Capt.-- that period of time did /not/ last long either and was probably a 
fluke in the first place . The fellow mixing soap needs to know a thing or 
two about marketing if he's ever going to sell it and that's got little to 
do with SE placement. Yeah, Jeff Bezos did o.k. after spending how much 
money??, but there's a lot of dog food floating around the Yukon too.

So how about those regional sites and links?? That's sounding pretty darn 
good all of a sudden.

Tamara

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA