Re: Email addresses

by Roy Laws <rlaws(at)northstate.net>

 Date:  Tue, 28 Nov 2000 23:09:16 -0800
 To:  Brent <brent(at)dogwoodshelties.net>,
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
 References:  home
  todo: View Thread, Original
Brent,

I'm no Outlook guru but what I have done is setup my groups as BCC which is 
Blind Carbon Copy, the person that receives it gets it showing only their 
address.  This may work for you.

Roy


At 09:23 PM 11/28/00 -0600, Brent wrote:
>I'm trying to create a e-mail list and forward e-mail to everyone in the
>group.  So far, no problem, but additionally I'd like that when the program
>sends the e-mail that no one else can see who all is on the list in order to
>protect the privacy of each person.  Currently I'm using Microsoft Outlook
>for organizing my different e-mail accounts, calendar and contact
>information.  When it sends e-mail to the groups I've created thus far
>everyone is listed.  Is there a way to do this in Outlook? I know it's not
>exactly a HTML question but thought someone here in the group might know a
>way of sending e-mail to multiple people but have the recipients only see
>their own e-mail address.  I'd like to stay with Outlook if at all possible
>but I'm certain that like my WYSIWYG editor I'll be told how BAD Outlook is!
>*laugh* Ok, bullet proof vest on....any ideas anyone?
>
>Brent
>
>--
>Brent & Sherri Chance
>Jonesboro, Arkansas
>http://www.dogwoodshelties.net/
>~~~~~~~ Home of ~~~~~~~
>Dogwood Shetland Sheepdogs
>Second Chance Sheltie Rescue
>CH. Cataway's Patent Pending,"Penny" &
>Ch. T'HY'LA'S The Next Generation UDX,"Riker"
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org]On
>Behalf Of Kate Pollara
>Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 7:49 PM
>To: hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
>Subject: Re: frames compatibility
>
>
>so does this mean that once you get listed you can add frames pages?
>Kate Pollara
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paul Wilson" <webgooru(at)gte.net>
>To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>; "Lori Eldridge" <lorield(at)uswest.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:23 AM
>Subject: Re: frames compatibility
>
>
> > > Could someone please tell me which of the older browsers don't
> > > support frames? I'm trying to talk a client out of using them and I
> > > need some stats.
> >
> > Too many to mention, many early browsers were incapable.  The real problem
> > is with search engine spidering of the website.
> >
> > Besides making the website a lot more confusing to manage and raising his
> > costs, he needs to know that some search engines cannot and will not index
> > or spider this websight.  See http://www.laisha.com/excite.html  for
> > background.   Excite & Lycos will not index frames.  Infoseek has trouble
> > with frames.  There are probably more.
> >
> > When we first built our main website, we used frames and had a dickens of
>a
> > time getting it registered.  I found mention of the frames problem and
> > converted the website to non-frame and we started showing up almost
> > immediatly.  Our personal experience shows this is not a myth, we proved
>it.
> >
> > Paul Wilson
> > webgooru(at)gte.net
> >

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA