Re: validating &153; (TM)
by Timothy Luoma <luomat(at)operamail.com>
|
| Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:31:33 -0500 |
| To: |
hwg-basics(at)mail.hwg.org |
| References: |
S0026260871 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:58:59 -0500, Keith D Sellars <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>
wrote:
>> <SUP><FONT SIZE="-1">TM</FONT></SUP>
>>
>> This should work for what your looking for.
ICK! Not if you're looking to get away from the messier side of markup.
> Yeah, that's what I wound up doing before I even got any responses, but
> was wondering if there was an accepted ascii equivalent.
Actually to do it properly you'd need:
<SUP><FONT SIZE="-1"><acronym title="Trademark">TM</acronym></FONT></SUP>
But if we get to cleaner markup this would be better
<span class="trademark"><acronym title="Trademark">TM</acronym></span>
But it would be much, much simpler and better to use ™ or ™
TjL
--
Timothy J. Luoma ~ http://tntluoma.com
30 Days to Becoming an Opera Lover
http://tntluoma.com/opera/lover/
HTML Guild: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Web Professionals @ IWA