Re: Critique of three possible designs

by "Jennifer Siebel" <JSiebel(at)email.msn.com>

 Date:  Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:16:00 -0600
 To:  "Christopher Desir" <cdesir(at)jhu.edu>,
<hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
  todo: View Thread, Original
I like the first site the best.  The lighthouse animation is very visually
interesting but doesn't interfere with the content.  The whole page is
clean,  the color scheme is great, navigation is easy to understand.

I like the lighthouse on the second site too, but don't care for the blocky
page layout as much.

The lighthouse on the third site moves down jerkily when I scroll down.  The
color scheme, while pleasing, doesn't seem to work with the content.  I like
your rollovers, but would save them for another project.  The people and
their quotes worked, but seems too familiar.  And if you're not paying close
attention, they pass by and you miss their quotes.

Numero uno!
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Desir <cdesir(at)jhu.edu>
To: hwg-critique(at)hwg.org <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:12 PM
Subject: Critique of three possible designs


>Hello,
>
>I am working on a web site for an AIDS research center, and I have come up
>with three designs so far.  The content isn't there; I want to first decide
>on the design before putting it in.
>
>The three URLs are as follows:
>http://cdesir.hypermart.net/lighthouse1/
>http://cdesir.hypermart.net/lighthouse2/ (does not render correctly in
>Netscape)
>http://cdesir.hypermart.net/lighthouse3/
>
>Any feedback--including which design has the most potential--would be
>greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA