Re: html editors

Not to sound crass, but have you ever thought about trying to just use a
text editor to write the HTML by hand.  No matter how good the page builders
can be, you can always do a lot more by coding it yourself and the files
always end up smaller because you don't have redundant commands in the
source code.  I might seem like a lot to learn, but I have found that it is
rather simple.  Give it a try and save a few bucks in the process.
-----Original Message-----
From: H. G. Quinn <hgquinn(at)ibm.net>
To: hwg-critique(at)hwg.org <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
Date: Saturday, September 18, 1999 3:43 PM
Subject: html editors


>Philip, I completely agree with Bruce on Homesite. I've used it for about 9
>months, and it's excellent.  It's becoming a standard tool in some large
web
>design shops.  I especially like its project management capabilities.
>
>Bruce Klaiss wrote:
>
>> Philip,
>>
>> At 08:54 PM 9/17/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>> >Currently I am trying out a demo of  HomeSite 4.0 . Before I go out and
>> buy another editor,
>> >Does anyone have any advise. Please keep in mind that while I am sure
that
>> some of the
>> >$300 ones are worth their weight in gold to some people, I don't see
>> myself spending over
>> >$150.
>>
>> Definitely go for HomeSite 4.0.  After Symantec Visual Page choked on me,
>> and FrontPage Express proved unsatisfactory, I tried the demo and fell in
>> love.  Remember, though, your mileage may vary.  Everybody reading this
>> will have their favorite tool, from HotDog Pro to a simple Notepad.
>>
>> Bruce Klaiss
>> Harper Research Associates
>>
>> http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Villa/2617/
>> http://www.mastermason.com/friendship-83/
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA