Fw: Anyone in the mood to be cut-throat and opinionated?

Re-Directed for accuracy...

-----Original Message-----
From: J. Foliot <fouram(at)sympatico.ca>
To: Gltbeach <Gltbeach(at)aol.com>
Date: April 11, 1998 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone in the mood to be cut-throat and opinionated?


>Re-read the message...
>Item one - I SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT IT WAS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FLAME
>FEST.
>
>Item two - They SPECIFICALLY requested a _cut-throat critique_, of which I
>delivered...
>(So far I've not heard back from them one way or the other, however, even
if
>in your opinion I was too hard on them, was I wrong?  Did you even bother
to
>visit the site in question?)
>
>Item three - <<<<in it's self>>> ...explain to me why this is grammatically
>incorrect
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gltbeach <Gltbeach(at)aol.com>
>To: fouram(at)sympatico.ca <fouram(at)sympatico.ca>
>Cc: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
>Date: April 10, 1998 10:33 PM
>Subject: Re: Anyone in the mood to be cut-throat and opinionated?
>
>
>>
>>
>>Mr. F (and I use the term loosely)
>>
>>The second part of your msg was valid, worthwhile information, however,
the
>>first part of your msg should have been sent back private e-mail to the
>person
>>whose site you were critiquing (bashing).  The entire reply is akin to
>>slapping the sh_t out of someone then explaining to them why you were
>>compelled to slap them in the first place and how it was for their own
>good.
>>I hope for the good of the individual, yes, we all have egos, you
>apologize.
>>And the next time you decide to start throwing rocks inside of your glass
>>house please run a grammar check on it first. <<<<in it's self>>> My, my,
>my,
>>why did you not just slam both words together...it would not have been any
>>worse.  Finally, please stop dangling your participles all over my
>>e-mail.
>>
>>Yours now and forever
>>
>>Gary Taylor
>>http://members.aol.com/gltbeach
>>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA