Re: OT: I have a question...

Well, I agree, but that is more with known specific problems.  I thought
that this would be a general submission process, where unknown issues would
be uncovered by the many different people hitting the submitted URL.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kym Jones" <kjones(at)adam.com.au>
To: "Paul Mennega" <paul(at)mennega.com>; <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: OT: I have a question...


>
>
>
> I think it's a neat idea but isn't that what the Techniques list is
> for...kinda sorta ?
>
> Kym
>
>
> At 09:43 PM 19/01/2001 -0500, Paul Mennega wrote:
> >That I thought this list would be best suited to answer.  I, along with
many
> >of you I am sure, design web pages for a living.  I find this list VERY
> >informative and helpful, as I may not critique many of the sites, but I
> >certainly take head to some of the other's comments.
> >
> >Now for the question:
> >
> >The Critique list is helpful in look & feel type issues, but it does not
> >really get into many 'testing' issues, as it shouldn't.  That, however is
> >something I would cherish.  If I could submit my site to a group of web
> >developers(like this list), and then have some of these developers follow
up
> >and test the submitted site, I think that it could be extremely helpful.
> >What I am proposing is a sort of Testing mailing list.  Would any other
> >developers out there be interested in such a list, and would you become a
> >member?
> >
> >Again, this is slightly OT, so thank you for your time/patience.  If a
list
> >like this already exists, please point me in the correct direction.
> >
> >Thank you, Paul Mennega
> >http://www.mennega.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA