Re: i.am/briangstp "CONTENT"

Im not sure i agree with the percentages.....  but he makes a good point...
but we also have to keep in mind that each sites "content" has to be based
upon the type of site it is....  i dont think any of use have a right to
judge his content because of its "nature".......if the site's content doesnt
match the site's purpose... then i agree.. but this is a personal site...  i
think we can be a little less critical of the type of content that goes on
these types of sites....

Woody


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Bridge" <sbridg(at)barrister.com>
To: <modest013(at)hotmail.com>; <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>; <katsuey(at)katsuey.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: i.am/briangstp "CONTENT"


I am not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone, but "CONTENT" is 90% of a
website and 10% design, what do we go to a web sites for? The "CONTENT" not
the design.  I feel content should be judged when being critiqued.  Unless
this email list is for design critiquing only?

The percentages and thoughts above are just my opnion, and everyone is
entitled to an opnion regardless if we feel it's right or wrong.

Stuart Bridge
Internet Administrator/ Webmaster
Barrister Global Services Network
http://www.barrister.com
http://www.barrister-net.com
http://globalservnet.com/gsn/
http://www.buffalowaterfront.com
http://www.computingbybridge.com
Phone: 716-845-1810

>>> "Quinn Leonowicz" <modest013(at)hotmail.com> 10/17/2000 12:21:46 AM >>>
How could you expect not to start a war with views like that?  A warning for
minors??? as if homosexuality is pornography???   I suppose your location
could be used as an excuse, but not in this day and age.  You would have
been better served keeping your thoughts to yourself and not even mentioning
that you had time to visit the site.  I propose that unless you promise to
critique sites subjectively regardless of their content, you remove yourself
from this list.



           (((  .-���- ^~~ ^     __________________
            (         {>�Y�<}-- |staight but not narrow |
             \     )_  `~-~/
              \,,/,,/ \,,,�,,�






At 10:29 PM 10/16/2000 -0400, you wrote:

>Otherwise, just look at the site and let me know if anything annoys anyone
or
>if anyone has suggestions, comments, complaints, compliments, whatever...
Let
>me know.  I've had a great time making this site and it's all about me -
>Brian.  Let me know if there's anything I can do to make it better!

Well Brian, yes, there is.  I hope not to start a war here, but your sexual
musings turned me off and I left.  I see no reason for this on a site -
like who is interested?  No, it's not a gay bashing thing - rather I don't
think anyone would be interested in my sexual thoughts and actions and it
certainly doesn't belong on a site which is to be taken seriously in the
web design arena.  It also should have a warning with it when you ask for a
critique since minors or people who just plain could be offended might be
involved in providing the critique.  Just my $.02



Brown Holdings LLC Group
Katsuey's Legal Gateway
http://www.katsuey.com
KatsueyDesignWorks, Custom Web Design
http://www.katsueydesignworks.com
RGreatHosts, Hosting and Domain Name Purchasing
http://www.rgreathosts.com

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA