by "Dr. George John" <georgedr(at)giasbg01.vsnl.net.in>

 Date:  Fri, 17 Jul 1998 22:27:23 +0500
 To:  "Critique List" <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
  todo: View Thread, Original
A very aesthetic site. Viewed in Netscape4.04 on a P II 266 with a 33.6
connection at 800 and 1024 with a Viewsonic 17". The animated GIF made
download a bit long. But very well done and in a low key compared to some
sites which overwhelm.
doc
>I would very much appreciate a gentle <g> critique on a re-design of our
site. I have IE4.0 and NN4.0.
 I am looking for download times (which on this end seem to be long, so
gentle <g>suggestions on that?) Just mostly suggestions on improving bad
download times without sacrificing graphics quality is what I would like,
not on content or design/layout. And, perhaps a comment on the smaller
graphics. (for those that have seen the site previously with the larger
graphics) (yes, I viewed in 1024 and 640, although designed in 800 on a 15"
monitor)
All pages seem to validate with w3c for 4.0 transitional. URL is:
http://www.showcasewebdesign.com
Thank you for your time, it is appreciated.
Melinda G.
>http://www.showcasewebdesign.com

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA