Re: first paid site!!!!

>640x480 ns4.06 52000
>1.the blue wording on the opening page can't be read
You're right, I have removed it.

>2.kill the frames,you do not need them
Why?  I am using them to:
	a) reduce d/l
	b) control layout

>3.the navigation is poor,only allowing you to go in one direction
You're right again, I shall work on this next.

>3.colors are good
Thank you!

>4.loaded fast
Good!

>hope this helps
Yep!  Anything else?

phil.


>C and P wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have just completed (except for filling in a few alt tags, width height
>> tags etc) my first ever contracted, PAID site.  YAY!  It is for a singles
>> dating service, based here in Toronto.  To test it I have put it onto a
>> xoom account:  http://members.xoom.com/enigmatize
>>
>> Would some of you be so kind as to take a look and tell me what you see?
>> How is the layout?  Navigation?  DL time?  Design?  etc etc.  Please
>> include all your specs. :)
>>
>> All the graphics, except the main logo, were provided via mac disks (I use
>> a PC grrrr) in black and white .eps format.  They were all very large, some
>> around 20 MB, so I have had to resize and retouch most of them.  I couldn't
>> handle the black and white so I have coloured them all.  Please tell me
>> what you think of this...  black and white is ok, but there is just too
>> many of them... what do you think?
>>
>> Another thing I could use some info on is time.  It took me approx. 30hrs
>> from when I got the disks and hardcopy to where I am now.  Do you think
>> this is an acceptable time frame for the results?  I had to make a few
>> graphics, basically anything that isnt a photo or a cartoon, and had to
>> retouch the rest.  I have a few more contracts lined up for January... I
>> want to start to prepare quotes but the time frame for a site is what I
>> have trouble with...
>>
>> Ok that's it,
>>
>> thanks guys!
>> phil.
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA