Re: OT: I have a question...

Kinda like a ...try it and see if you can break it deal ?


At 10:34 PM 19/01/2001 -0500, Paul Mennega wrote:
>Well, I agree, but that is more with known specific problems.  I thought
>that this would be a general submission process, where unknown issues would
>be uncovered by the many different people hitting the submitted URL.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kym Jones" <kjones(at)adam.com.au>
>To: "Paul Mennega" <paul(at)mennega.com>; <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:22 PM
>Subject: Re: OT: I have a question...
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it's a neat idea but isn't that what the Techniques list is
>> for...kinda sorta ?
>>
>> Kym
>>
>>
>> At 09:43 PM 19/01/2001 -0500, Paul Mennega wrote:
>> >That I thought this list would be best suited to answer.  I, along with
>many
>> >of you I am sure, design web pages for a living.  I find this list VERY
>> >informative and helpful, as I may not critique many of the sites, but I
>> >certainly take head to some of the other's comments.
>> >
>> >Now for the question:
>> >
>> >The Critique list is helpful in look & feel type issues, but it does not
>> >really get into many 'testing' issues, as it shouldn't.  That, however is
>> >something I would cherish.  If I could submit my site to a group of web
>> >developers(like this list), and then have some of these developers follow
>up
>> >and test the submitted site, I think that it could be extremely helpful.
>> >What I am proposing is a sort of Testing mailing list.  Would any other
>> >developers out there be interested in such a list, and would you become a
>> >member?
>> >
>> >Again, this is slightly OT, so thank you for your time/patience.  If a
>list
>> >like this already exists, please point me in the correct direction.
>> >
>> >Thank you, Paul Mennega
>> >http://www.mennega.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA