Re: Request critique please
by Shdowrks(at)aol.com
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:55:16 EDT |
To: |
pdvsfh(at)xs4all.nl |
Cc: |
hwg-critique(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
<< http://members.xoom.com/bachmidi/bachmidi.html >>
>>>>bachmidi.html takes a long
time to load. What do you think
I should put on a seperate page<<<<
IMHO, everything under:
"Druck; Druck- und Verlagshaus Beltz-R=FCbelmann/Hemsbach
Printed in Germany"
can go on it's own page. The Contents, etc could go on it's own page. Ma=
ny of=0Athe icons, pics and banners are added "fluff" and you may want to=
pick and=0Achoose what is important. It's all the little pics that incre=
ase the download=0Atime. I allowed the page to start loading, and stopped=
it after counting to=0A20, what hadn't loaded yet were most of these pic=
s.
Clicking on "Contents" in the left frame reloaded the first page. You mig=
ht=0Awant to at least add an anchor to the actual "Contents" so that it p=
uts that=0Ainfo at top of page. (Or, it's own page...)
The text lines in the left frame are WAY long, had to resize the frame to=
half=0Athe entire page size to see it all.
>>>an entry (click here to enter) page?<<<
It just adds one more page to wait to download, and adds more user clicks=
=0Abefore they find their information. Not really needed for this type o=
f site.
But...
Lots and lots of information here, and it is organized rather well consid=
ering=0Aits size. But, providing ALL of the information up front is not r=
eally=0Aneccessary. A more simple outline of the site up front, and grea=
ter detail on=0Aselection of "content" "index" etc might be helpful for d=
ownload time and=0Ageneral simplification of site search.
I like the colors and graphics. The text was easy to read and info very=
=0Athorough. Obviously lots of work time put in on this. Good job, good l=
uck...
EA
-
shdowrks(at)aol.com
http://www.shadoworks.com/design/xindex.htm
=0A
HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmaster @ IWA