RE: Q to Peter, Richard, Ed, Johnny, Tanya

And what if you have participated in reading these lists, as many do and
browsed the web pages, as many do? Does this mean that you do not
understand what it means to be a part of the Guild? I would have to believe
that participation in listserves does not only have to be in the form of
contributions. IMHO, you can gain as much understanding about the
organization by reading the posts.

Tanya Spain


>> >On the other hand, I caution against voting _merely_ based on
>> >volume.  The qualities that make a good list contributor may
>> >not necessarily be the best qualities for running an organization.
>>
>> Nor does it speak to the *quality* of the posts.
>
>You can only judge quality when there is a quanity greater than
>zero. But I'd think that you should have a general knowledge of
>what it's like contributing/posting to the lists if you're going to
>make decisions about contributing/posting to the lists that effect
>people that contribute/post to the lists.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bart Szyszka                 ICQ: 4982727
>B Grafyx "We Make Bee-utiful Graphics"
>http://www.bgrafyx.com/
>----------------------------------------------------------------------

HWG: hwg-elections mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA