Re: Display size?
by "Carolyn Balkum" <design(at)graphics4us.com>
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 14:00:50 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
suite224 |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Three weeks ago I took over an existing hobby site and I instantly stuck a
tracker on it even though I haven't changed the site yet :-( and :-)
This hobby is for adults (not XXX stuff!!!) but the site is heavily accessed
by the general public and children because of the services provided at a
county park. I
have been gratified to get these statistics, although not large in numbers,
I think it's a good sampling of what's out there in the non-techie masses.
800x600 103 55.37%
1024x768 45 24.19%
640x480 29 15.59%
1152x864 3 1.61%
1280x1024 3 1.61%
Other 2 1.07%
1600x1200 1 0.53%
What I didn't like was the screen colors:
16 Bit (65K) 92 49.46%
8 Bit (256) 39 20.96%
32 Bit (16.7M) 31 16.66%
24 Bit (16.7M) 20 10.75%
Other 4 2.15%
Just thought I'd throw this out for your info.
Carolyn
----- Original Message -----
From: <webmaster(at)webzar.com>
To: <hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 12:12 PM
Subject: Display size?
> Anyone seen any current statistics on viewer resolution settings? The last
> report I saw (December '98) indicated about 49% of the internet population
> browsed at 640x480 and about the at 800x600 (you other 2% know who you
are).
>
> Books and such I've perused with 1998 or 1999 copyrights insist that the
> 640x480 market share is still high and that the 640x480 design model is
> still in vogue (Woe is you, they say, if you present your viewer with the
> dreaded horizontal scroll bar).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rich
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA