Re: neat split image URL for training
by "Collin Lim" <collinlim(at)hotmail.com>
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 May 1998 10:38:53 PDT |
To: |
stanleysupport(at)prodigy.net |
Cc: |
hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org, hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
The fast load time you observed at http://www.hoopla.com/ is due to the
fact that the four images were saved with 256 colors and probably
heavily optimized. You'll notice that the quality is quite low when
viewed with high color. May have something to do with a fast server
too. It definitely has nothing to do with HTML technique.
-Collin
========================================
Hi Collin,
I visited the site that this original post was about, and I did see
something spectucular compared to the site of the url that you posted. I
am running on 33.6 modem, and have a Stealth II graphics accelerator,
4MB, and there was a big difference in load time between the two. I was
shocked to see that a photograph with many different colors would load
so much faster than the logo image that you have displayed on your url.
I am just learning about graphics, so dont take any offense to this. I
am curious to why this is?? Anyone have any input, please inform.
Thanks.
Cindy
Collin Lim wrote:
>
> I must be missing the point. I checked out that site and did not find
> anything unusual or spectacular. It is simply one image split into
four
> and displayed in a way that they appear to be one image. You saw the
> images sequentially came together as one because they loaded slowly
over
> the Internet. You said you copied the HTML and images and the images
> came together very quickly. That's probably because your harddisk is
> much quicker than the Internet connection.
>
> If you're interested with split images, checkout this site:
>
> http://members.xoom.com/burleson/photo/zgalsel.html
>
> -Collin
>
> ==============================
>
> This morning in my local paper there was a recommended
> URL that is following. The reason I am bringing it up here
> is that I think it a URL that concerns itself with split
> images and the source code is not complicated. I am interested
> in knowing how the image was split into four parts as it
> opened, then how it sequentially came together as one
> image.
>
> If you don't think an analysis of this site would be interesting
> for the thread, then I understand. I copied the HTML and the
> images, but it just came together as one picture very quickly.
> Nothing like the site depicts.
>
> It is also a cute, simple and warm little story, but I think a
> technique could be learned from the "how" of it..
>
> The URL is:
>
> http://www.hoopla.com/
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA