Re: Code instead of graphics

It doesn't need CSS or other new stuff because EVERYTHING
is images. there is no text that is not part of the images.

The HTML underneath is really atrocious, lots of excessive
duplication.

I wouldn't say it is a bad site, but as an example of neat
or good design it is nothing new or extraordinary. I have
seen people on this list create some really great stuff,
that we could learn more from.

here is one that comes to mind:

http://www.bgrafyx.com/

Have fun, I don't mean to discredit whoever did make
JoinHands' site.

Luke

===

                - ( luke opperman ) -
     Spigot Graphics, Cohesive Design for the Web
          - ( http://spigot.hypermart.net/ ) -  

-- ..some tiny cows, two brushstrokes each,
       but confidently cows.. - 'Poem' by Elizabeth Bishop




---"Jones, Sharon" <sjones05(at)harris.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen mentioned http://www.joinhand.org/ as a good
site design, and I highly
> agree.  However, I'd love to know how they created it
(I've sent an email to
> them, but haven't gotten a response).  It loads
correctly in Netscape 3 and
> higher and in AOL.  Those are the browsers I always test
in.  Style sheets don't
> work in Netscape 3, and some of the code I haven't seen
before.  Does anyone
> know what authoring tool might have been used, or where
I can learn more about
> some of the code on this site?
>  
> 
> Sharon Jones
> Web Site Designer
> Harris Corporation
> email:  sjones05(at)harris.com
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free (at)yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA