Re: Copyright
by Peggi & Ben Rodgers <woodduck(at)mbay.net>
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2001 10:00:30 -0700 |
To: |
hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
aol |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hi Peter,
I'm not a lawyer, but I am a writer/photographer. I know that any original
writing and photographs I produce belong to me and are copyrighted as
such. I do know this is a hot topic at the moment and one large company
(Pebble Beach Company in California) has, in fact, said that photographers
cannot take a photo of a particular cypress tree that is the logo of their
company. This has created some lawsuits as to whether they have the right
to prohibit photographers from copyrighting photos of a tree (standing on
public property) simply because it happens to be part of their logo. As
far as I know, to date they haven't won this point.
HTH
Peggi
At 06:29 AM 5/26/01 -0400, Reywob(at)aol.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When not doing web design I do a lot of model making, and attend many model
>exhibitions. Recently someone, who I will refer to as Mr X, has been kicking
>up a fuss about people taking photographs of his models he is exhibiting, and
>then publishing them on their websites - crediting the model to him but
>copyrighting the photographs to themselves. He believes that as it is his
>model shown, he should own the copyright of the photographs.
>
>I always thought that the photographer owned the copyright to the photos, and
>so far my response has been that if Mr X doesn't like people taking photos of
>his models then he shouldn't exhibit them. Is this correct? He has
>currently banned people from taking photographs or videoing his layout, but
>still wants the photographs removed. What is the legal position?
>
>Any advice gratefully received!
>Thanks,
>Peter.
Peggi Rodgers
Flash Programmer
Misty Canyon Designs
Pacific Grove, CA
prodgers(at)mistycanyon.com
www.mistycanyon.com
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA