Re: 72 DPI (ppi) fallacy?
by Steven W Loney <steve(at)thewebguy.ca>
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:33:17 -0500 |
To: |
hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org |
References: |
attglobal rr |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Since I can never figure out why web designers would even test pages on a
mac I can't imagine why we'd go with 96ppi.
For the last 3 years in the English speaking online world their presence
has hovered between 1% & 2% of online traffic when measured against a
traffic sample of 3 to 4 hundred million visitors in a 30 day period.
I suppose that if a client's market was focused on the print/graphic arts
industry where mac has it's baby toe hold you might buy a mac for that
project. Of course once it's done it would be a silly waste of valuable
time to spend developing hours even viewing pages on it.
Steve
At 01:43 AM 10/21/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Since we're dealing with both PC and Macs on the web, why would you not
>change to 96 ppi, instead of 72 ppi....
>So why not default to the screens requiring more info? Or am I missing
>something, and it won't matter at either setting?
>
>- Greg Hart
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA