DW MX (was Re: picture slicer)

I hate the new panel layout of MX, even on a 20" monitor the document 
window is too small. However, you can set the preferences to "classic" 
Dreamweaver so it looks like Dreamweaver 3/4.

I like the split code/design view, the accessibility features, the built in 
validation support, and support for XHTML.

If you use the database side of it, it now supports ASP.NET, Cold Fusion, 
and PHP. (I think UltraDev 4 only supported ASP and JSP originally.)

My MX version seems to crash less now too.

But for pure HTML needs...I don't see too much difference between the old 
and the new.

At 09:38 PM 04/17/2003 -0400, Keith D Sellars wrote:
>I have DreamWeaver 3.0 and have gotten pretty familiar with all of its
>capabilities (since I've had it so long, I guess I "should" have gotten
>familiar with it by now!!!).  I am considering upgrading to MX, but it looks
>so much different from 3.0.  For anyone that is using it (MX), do you like
>it?  What all will/can it do that, say DreamWeaver can't do (apart from
>obvious feature upgrades that could be expected to be included)?
>
>Thanks,
>Keith D Sellars
>WebGraffix
>www.webgraffix.com
>
>"Making database sites seem easy"

==================================================================
Attention Web Designers and JavaScript, VBScript, and ASP Programmers:
Buy your career related T-Shirts, Coffee Mugs, and Mousepads at
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/store.aspx?storeid=utccom,utccom2,utccom3,utccom4
==================================================================

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA