Re: Load Time Question (was: Image in a table)

by Coolmelon3 <Coolmelon3(at)aol.com>

Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 1998 13:08:03 EST
To:	tom(at)sqlman.com, hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org
	todo: View Thread, Original

<<  I was told somewhere along the way that 10 10K images will load much
faster than 1
 100k image. >>

Hi Tom,

	My understanding in all fact no. 100k is 100k, but the smaller pieced image
will visually seem to appear faster due to each piece will become visible
after loading rather then having to wait for the whole 100k big image to
download. I haven't tested this method.
	I personally avoid such a large images.

I hope this helps,

Kord Nelson
Coolmelon3(at)aol.com
web designer

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA