Re: Graphics packages?

In a message dated 8/11/99 8:50:14 PM GMT Daylight Time, jflyer(at)brunnet.net=20
writes:

> If all you will be doing is web graphics PSP is an excellent tool with a=20
very
> small learning curve despite it's power.

Am I the only person on the list who doesn't like PSP?  I tried it, but=20
couldn't stand it.  Much prefer a mix of vector and bitmap capabilities. =20
Fireworks seems very good (I'm on day 2 of my 30 day trial!) however rather=20
expensive.  I have found Satori (www.satoripaint.com) who produce WebFX2000=20
and FilmFX3 which seem to be pretty good (the 64-bit version of FilmFX was=20
used to create some of the scenes in the Hollywood blockbuster 'The Matrix')=
,=20
but best of all they are cheap (FilmFX3 is on offer at =A349/$75).  Very=20
tempting, especially as it is receiving very good reviews, such as:

"Amazing functionality leaves market leading photoshop looking comparatively=20
outdated, underpowered and overpriced. Here's your chance to see the graphic=
s=20
engine of the future".
Satori FilmFX 3.0 review PC Pro, March 1999

Has anyone had any experience with the above programs?  Worth checking out=20
anyhow.

Peter.

www.peterswebpage.findhere.com

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA