Re: RAQ4
by "Kevin Bayley" <webmaster(at)prairienorth.com>
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:54:22 -0600 |
To: |
"Billy O'Connor" <billyo(at)kennetweb.co.uk>, <hwg-servers(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
work |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Not sure about the Raq4, but I am running a Raq3 and I am very happy with
it. It functions very well. The only thing I may do is add more ram.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Billy O'Connor" <billyo(at)kennetweb.co.uk>
To: <hwg-servers(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: RAQ4
> Hi All,
>
> I've just re-subscribed after about a year or two away and wondered if
> anyone has experience of running a dedicated RAQ4? I am looking into going
> down this route, only someone has told me they have had bad experiences
with
> them some time ago. Have they improved?
>
> Thanks for you help.
>
> Bill.
>
>
HWG: hwg-servers mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA