Re: WYSIWYG (reasons not to use)
by Christian Lavoie <clavoie(at)enter-net.com>
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:14:42 GMT |
To: |
hwg-software(at)mail.hwg.org |
References: |
placeware ks |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
> Why are Dreamweaver and HoTMetal Pro *good*
> WYSIWYG tools?
Dreamweaver:
- Doesn't modify existing code unless otherwise instructed.
- Is not tied to a single browser
- Integrates nicely into HomeSite (which I use a lot), and therefor=20
provides a good way to have a hand-editing editor at hand
- If you stay with Macromedia, their tools fits nice together=20
(although not quite as good as if you used Adobe tools only, as an=20
example, and it's been quite a good time I used Macromedia things, so=20
I may be out of date a bit)
- Has some great features WYSIWYG feature (see the CNET review for=20
more on this)
I've never used HoTMetal Pro.
Christian Lavoie
clavoie(at)enter-net.com
UIN: 947212
HWG: hwg-software mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA