Re: Switching to Windows NT
by Kayla Block <kblock(at)placeware.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 1998 10:29:26 -0700 |
To: |
bzabor19(at)idt.net, hwg-software(at)hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
idt |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 08:54 PM 8/3/98 -0600, bzabor19(at)idt.net wrote:
>I was asked by an associate if there is a downside to switching from
>Win95 to NT, and the only thing I could remember is that it's more
>stable than 95. Are there any negative trade-offs?
>
Not all machines can run NT, not all peripherals are as well supported as
they are under 95, and it takes more ram to run NT. I'm not sure if it's
any more stable than 95, but it does have better memory management. I much
prefer it over 95.
Kayla
============================================================
Kayla Block 650.526.6103
Engineer kblock(at)placeware.com
============================================================
HWG: hwg-software mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA