RE: WYSIWYG (reasons not to use)

If this is true, and I'm not saying it isn't (no matter how unlikely) I would 

**************** LOVE ******************

to see some UNMODIFIED pages posted to the web so that I can satisfy myself
(via validation) that someone has finally gotten their act together.

If ****ANYONE **** would be so kind as to post (whether privately or
publicly) some URL's I would greatly appreciate it!

TIA,
Fuzzy


At 10:31 AM 3/23/99 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
>Dreamweaver is good because it is a wysiwyg tool and
>it generates standards compliant code. It also doesn't
>mess up existing code when you use it to open existing
>files. And it is extensible and can take advantage of
>external objects, etc.
>
>Peter Williams - LAN Support/Webmaster
>peter.williams(at)hendersons.com.au
>http://www.hendersons.com.au/ 

__________________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
(yes, one of the now infamous: "O'Lary Boys")
webmaster(at)canopy.net
sysop(at)mail.ruediger.leon.k12.fl.us
Member of the HTML Writers Guild and 
International Webmasters Association
------------------------------------------------------------------

HWG: hwg-software mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA