Re: SHTML

by "Paul Roberts" <roberts_paul(at)bigfoot.com>

 Date:  Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:12:50 -0000
 To:  "HWG Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  louisville WORKGROUP bellsouth
  todo: View Thread, Original
you can do this in htaccess as well, just put the following lines in.

AddType text/html .html
AddHandler server-parsed .html
AddType text/html .htm
AddHandler server-parsed .htm


Paul Roberts
roberts_paul(at)bigfoot.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rudy Gomez" <rudy(at)cyberangler.com>
To: "Paul Wilson" <webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com>
Cc: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: SHTML


One possible problem is if you have many web pages already established
within the search engines.  When you change for example, from foo.html, to
foo.shtml, the .shtml page would be considered a new page in the search
engines.

This happened to me a long time ago and my host at the time was nice enough
to adjust my apache configuration to parse .html files.  Therefore, all my
existing .html pages were then parsed as if they were .shtml files....  I
was able to use SSIs without changing the file names.

God Bless America,

Rudy Gomez                     \      ,,,,,,\\,,              ...><`>
rudy(at)cyberangler.com    }><(((((())))�� ...><`>
http://cyberangler.com/    /      `````//''             ...><`>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Does anyone know if any of the search engines penalize you for
> using it?  I looked at
> SearchEngineWatch and could not find any refernces.
>
> Paul Wilson
> webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA