RE: CFM vs ASP

I heard transaction support was there, but new. 

FKs, I understand, have been there a long time as well, but afaik
they're still not enforced, which was my real gripe. I should disclaim
that as well with the statement that I haven't looked into it for a few
months. 

I have been using mySql for small content management sites for a little
less than a year, coming from an SQL Server background I am beginning to
adjust, but my habits die pretty hard :)

I didn't want to mis-lead the original poster, my comment was just that
the environment and programmer are more important than the scripting
language. 

ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Frazier [mailto:ef(at)kwinternet.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: kenneth.dombrowski(at)designmattersinc.com
> Cc: 'Gibson, Timmi'; hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> Subject: RE: CFM vs ASP
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It is funny, transactions with mySQL are almost old news now, 
> but it still is taking so long for people to change their 
> thinking, get used to the idea. mySQL even has two(is there a 
> third?) different methods of dealing with transactions, 
> innodb or berkely db tables. I believe innodb even includes 
> forgeign keys which the mySQL people said they hated, but at 
> last they are there now. :) 
> 
> If you want to find CFM people just post to the wwwac.org 
> list. You will find lots of out of work CF people there :) 
> 
> 
> Eric 

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA