Re: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)

by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>

 Date:  Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:19:02 -0400
 To:  "HWG - Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  army
  todo: View Thread, Original
AOL 6.  Wonderful.

All I can say is that if they are going to go to all the trouble of using
the newset, most standards-compliant browser ever, they should also consider
ditching all the needless destruction during intallation, and opening their
"borders" to the world.

D

----- Original Message -----
From: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>
To: HWG - Techniques <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)


Remember, we're dealing with AOL here, people.  (And yes, I have an AOL
account!)  The confusion is probably arising over the distinction between
*AOL* version 5 (out now with a version of NS4 browser)  and an updated
version of NS to come out (NS5) which would make it AOL 6.  Are we confused
yet?  :)

Paul
"Steer toward the horizon...toward Heaven and Home!"

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon Doyle [mailto:shannon(at)oztek.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:25 AM
To: HWG - Techniques
Subject: Re: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)



>
> > No, AFAIR AOL announced that they would be releasing NS 6 not 5. Looks
like
> > they are trying to get ahead of IE :-).

Actually, it is my understanding that Netscape refer to their release of
the browser source code as their version 5. Not entirely sure on this, but
I have heard it in quite a few places and from quite a few different people.

- Shannon

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA