Re: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???

It does work well. You do, however, have to keep it patched against the
worms.

~ Kathleen Anderson
Spider Web Woman Designs
http://www.spiderwebwoman.com
email: kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Higgs" <chiggs(at)unimelb.edu.au>
To: "Kathleen Anderson" <kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com>; <pjkmecak(at)snet.net>;
"hwg-tech" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: November 21, 2001 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???


> At 07:33 PM 11/21/2001 -0500, Kathleen Anderson wrote:
> >Run IIS 5.0 Instead of PWS on Windows 2000 Professional
> >http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/6/32.ASP
>
> Interesting!  I've extensive experience of PWS under Win 95, and IIS under
NT4.
>
> I've recently looked at a system with "IIS" under W2000 Prof. and it looks
> very much to me like the PWS/W95 configuration.  Yes - the MCC panel
looked
> like IIS although with several services not working.  Interestingly I
found
> a PWS shell which accessed the same directories and everything worked
fine.
>
>
> Chris Higgs
> Manager, New Learning Technology
> ILFR, University of Melbourne
> http://www.landfood.unimelb.edu.au/
> Phone: +61 3 8344 9749  Fax: + 61 3 9348 2156
>
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA