Re: to www or not?
by Moe Rubenzahl <moe(at)maxim-ic.com>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:56:56 -0800 |
| To: |
Ellen Cotton <jellenc(at)ionet.net>,
hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org |
| References: |
ionet |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
I see it as a customer satisfaction issue. Bottom line is that a
customer may type www, they may not, but either way I want them to
find me. So I make sure that either one works. I can't imagine any
reason not to.
To do this, contact your ISP.
__________________________________________________________________________
Subject: to www or not?
Author: Ellen Cotton
Date: 11/1/00 10:34 AM -0600
>I have yet to see a discussion on the use of www. in a url address. It
>seems
>that more and more urls do not require the addition of the "www." in the
>
>address. Somewhere I read that it was a server issue, but then someone
>told
>me that it was a browser issue. I tend to believe that it is how the
>server is
>setup, on whether one needs to use it or not. One example of where it is
>
>needed (or the last time I checked) is on www.adobe.com....which of
>course
>everyone knows, is a major, major software company. Why would a few
>companies still have their servers setup to need the www. portion of an
>address.
>Seems like it would be a logical move to eliminate it?....anyone know
>more about
>how this works? ......Ellen
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA