hwg-theory archives | Aug 1998 | new search | results | previous | next |
Fw: Fw: Front Pagesby "Leslie J Owen" <leslieowen(at)Prodigy.net> |
|
>>I would be interested in knowing the opinion of the people whose day job is >>designing for businesses, compared to the opinion of the people who work at >>a University, or who design for a hobby. Those groups operate under >>different constraints. >You're making some rather broad assumptions about the requirements and >client base of the individuals posting in this thread, Leslie. In fact, that was a clear expression that I did not know who had a paying client base and who did not. It was not a broad assumption about the requirements and client base of those posting. It was a statement--a very clear statement, that professionals and hobbyists have different demands. I create a website on the side for a non-profit organization. I spend as much time as I choose on the site--just like a hobbyist. If they don't like what I do, they can get another volunteer to work for free. BTW, that site does not use java, javascript, large images, a splash page, or any bleeding edge technology. It loads quickly, and the alt tags include a description. >Part of the job of professional web developers is client education. Those >who choose not to, or claim "I'm too busy" are actually doing their clients >a disservice. The uneducated client is NOT always "right." >Ann It's interesting to me how quickly the responses become self-righteous. I *never* recommend bleeding edge technology. Never. Never. I recommend solid content, use quality graphics in moderation, etc. A client says, "I want my navigation to look just like site x." I respond, "I understand, but that site used an image map. Because of the number of graphics you already have on your page, I would recommend against using another graphic. Your download time will increase too much." Guess what. If the client insists on an image map, the client gets an image map. In fact, I am approachable, explain things well and **look out for our clients' best interests**. This is the comment I hear repeatedly, "While I have you on the phone, will you explain ________? and this_______? And what about this _______?" I ***never*** try to squeeze people for money. In fact, our prices are very reasonable, and I think we do too much for what we charge. I work 60 hours per week, take work home, etc. I do as much client education as possible. But I cannot educate every client on every issue. A client who has paid for a two page website--and refuses to pay more--cannot have unlimited time from me, from the designer, from the webmaster, etc. Everyone understands the idea that a hosting provider can limit the storage space provided with an email account; i.e., you will pay extra if you try to use your host server to store 25 mgs of email. Why is it so hard to understand the idea that a person who has paid for a two page site cannot have 6 hours of tech support/education? The Internet is still very new to many people--I talk to them every day. They do not understand or know where the line is drawn, or what is included with the design/hosting of their website. We know that buying a car works does not entitle us to free gas and oil. There is an established knowledge base among adult Americans about car ownership. There is not an established knowledge base about the Internet. Those new to the Net have very hazy ideas about how everything works. Their questions are almost endless, and as much as I like our clients, I could spend my entire day providing free tech support/education for anything computer-related. Notice I said computer-related, not just Internet-related. They're not sure where the line is drawn. It is, in fact, a disservice to my knowledgeable clients to spend all of my time educating the "new-to-the-net." The belief that I, or any web developer, can educate every customer on every issue is pie-in-the-sky. I have been asked for the following free instruction as part of the development of a small website: * How do I download and install a program? What's shareware.com? How do you spell that? * I want Yahoo! to come up when I log onto the Internet. How do I do that? * Will you teach me html so I don't have to pay you any more money for web design? * How do I upload using Front Page (I explain that I do not use Front Page, but that Microsoft provides free technical support for the programs they sell; the response I get is: Well, yes, but I have to pay for the call to them, and wait on hold. You have a toll-free number, and I don't have to wait for you.) * I need you to drive 30 miles to my office and set up the computers on our network to receive email. (again, this is expected as part of the design of a two page site; the mention of money brings outrage) * How do I log on to the Internet, and what is my password? (we are not an ISP--I say, please contact your provider. They have your password, and can help you make sure your settings are correct. This was a call from across the country because the client's ISP makes him wait on hold, so he'd rather talk to me.) * I recommend a "visitor" centered approach rather than a "company" centered approach for websites. I've received this response, "well, then you have to write the copy if you won't use what I've given you." In fact, I will use what was given to me. But if you ask me for a recommendation, I'll tell you to focus on the needs of your visitor. These questions are all in addition to the normal education: "You've asked for a dark background and white text. Do you know that if we use that combination for you, the average viewer will not be able to print your web page?" "I understand you like the java animation on whizbang.com. Not all browsers support java, and it can cause some of your visitor's browsers to crash. I would recommend against an applet for you at this time." etc. etc. Leslie Owen
HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA