Re: INFO: Theory List Defiined, etc...

In a message dated 8/26/98 05:34:14 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
cmj(at)airmail.net writes:

<< 
 1. Weigh that against #1 above ... what "relation" does an absolute have
 with another absolute?
 2. Weigh that against #2 above ... is there "speculation" as to where these
 scripts go?
 3. Weigh that against #3 above ... what "abstract principles of a body of
 fact" can be applied to this thread?
 4. Weigh that against #4 above ... was the solution to the thread "an ideal
 or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances"?
 5. Weigh that against #5 above ... is there some sort of "phenomena"
 involved with the placement of the script?
 6. Weigh that against #6 above ... what "hypothesis" can be derived from
 the message content?
 
 All of this weighs in the direction of "no" ... none of the definitions
 applied to the thread's subject matter.
 
 /end of definition .. >>
I guess as List guide we are subject to your interpertation. I on the otherhad
fin relationship to most of what you have defined as no. 
Therefore I can only conclude that my broader vision is outweighed by a
narrower vision...so feel free to remove me from the list

As an Aside Are you related to Robin Rocha?
Gio

HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA