Re: professionalism and wysiwyg
by JustGio(at)aol.com
|
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 06:56:16 EDT |
To: |
mkinsey(at)mindspring.com, hwg-theory(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
In a message dated 10/9/98 04:50:13 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
mkinsey(at)mindspring.com writes:
<<
HTML 4.0 Strict + CSS IS a beautiful thing, I'll agree with that... *until*
you look at it in a 3.0 browser. Or, for that matter, til you want to do so
much as right-align something... that's another post for another list,
though.
>>
Just a Thought ...I continually see references to the "older browsers"...yet
we continually move forward with design and coding. I would submit that the
end user/surfer has the responsibility to update his/her browser to keep up
with the times on the web. I personally don't have any regard for backward
compatability.especially since it doesn't take any effort at all to update
browser software. And yes I know the argument about people not being able to
afford better machines that will run the new software etc. but thats like
saying I shouldn't drive a porche cause the guy next door can only afford a
yugo.
Gio
HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA