Re: XHTML 1.0 validator at W3C

by "Joshua Graham" <JoshuaGraham(at)grahamis.com>

 Date:  Wed, 3 Oct 2001 20:21:32 +0100
 To:  <hwg-xml(at)hwg.org>
 References:  idyllmtn
  todo: View Thread, Original
I'm surprised that the "br" element is part of the Strict DTD then, as it's
surely presentation markup.

I tried to see if it was discussed in the HTML list at w3c but their search
wasn't working. Does anyone know why it was included or an argument as to
how it's somehow semantic and not for just presentation purposes?

Regards,
Josh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com>
To: <ccyrny(at)freenet.de>
Cc: <hwg-xml(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: XHTML 1.0 validator at W3C


> At 08:14 AM 10/3/2001 , Claus Cyrny wrote:
> >I have a short question. The validator at W3C marks the
> >attribute border="0" inside an <img> tag as invalid, whereas
> >the code of the validator itself
(http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html)
> >includes exactly (?) the same tag, and this page validates as
> >ok. What did I do wrong here?
> >The URL of my site is http://www.grafik-tips.org/.
>
> I could have answered this without checking, but I checked just to
> make sure.
>
> The Validator's page is written in XHTML Transitional.  Your page
> is written in XHTML Strict.  The @border attribute is only presentational
> markup and thus is allowed in Transitional and not allowed in Strict.
>
> --Kynn
>
> --
> Kynn Bartlett  <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com>                http://kynn.com/
> Technical Developer Liaison, Reef             http://www.reef.com/
> Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet   http://idyllmtn.com/
> Online Instructor, Accessible Web Design     http://kynn.com/+d201
>
>
>

HWG hwg-xml mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters