RE: Images & mouseovers
by Mark Stradling <mark.stradling(at)blueberry.net>
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:32:13 +0100 |
To: |
hwg-xml(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
I think we are mistaking 'don't have to have a DTD' for 'shouldn't have =
a
DTD'.
Although you CAN use XML without a DTD, that doesn't mean it's =
recommended,
best practice or even a good idea.
DTD-less XML can only be checked for well formedness, not for validity =
so
you can type any old cack you like, so long as it's inside <> tags, tag
cases match and your attributes are quoted.
When this reaches someone's backend system, which is expecting an XML =
packet
with a specific structure (a web site order for example, with billing =
and
shipping details, and order item details as I use on one website) it's =
no
use to anyone.
As palavras n=E3o significam nada a menos que voc=EA souber que =
l=EDngua voc=EA est=E1
usando.
Or (for the non Portuguese speakers)
Words mean nothing unless you know what language you are using.
And the DTD lets you know what language someone's XML is speaking and =
if
their grammar is correct.
Well that's my opinion.
Yours,
Mark Stradling
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Meadows [mailto:david(at)heroes.force9.co.uk]
> Sent: 27 September 2000 00:02
> To: Bryan Bateman; Kynn Bartlett
> Cc: KathyW; hwg-xml(at)hwg.org
> Subject: Re: Images & mouseovers
>=20
>=20
> "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't write a DTD for it; it's pretty ad-hoc. I don't have a
> > formal schema or anything. (The cool thing about XML is that
> > you don't have to have a DTD! Well, not a formal one.)
>=20
> You're sure that's a "cool thing"? You don't think it's more=20
> of an "unwanted
> side effect"?
>=20
> Sorry to play devil's advocate all the time Kynn, but coming=20
> from an SGML
> background I find XML downright sloppy and annoying a lot of the =
time.
>=20
>=20
> --
> David Meadows [ Technical Writer | Information Developer ]
> DNRC Minister for Littorasy * david(at)heroes.force9.co.uk
>=20
> "There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books
> are well written, or badly written. That is all."
> -- Oscar Wilde
>=20
>=20
HWG hwg-xml mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters