aware-techniques archives | Jan 2002 | new search | results | previous | next |
Fw: HWG AWARE-TECHNIQUES (was Hello?)by "Gail Isbell" <gisbell(at)ebusiness-oasis.com> |
|
Thanks for the info John. I agree that it would be ideal to only have one version of the web site, accessible to everyone. I was beginning to think that a text only version was my only alternative. But after reading today's posts to this list I am very encouraged. I don't feel like I am all alone out there. I am definitely going to give it a try. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Foliot - Another 4:00 AM Web Thing" <foliot(at)fouram.com> To: "Gail Isbell" <gisbell(at)ebusiness-oasis.com>; <aware-techniques(at)hwg.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:19 PM Subject: RE: HWG AWARE-TECHNIQUES (was Hello?) > From what I know, IBM's Home Page reader does a great job, and I believe is > currently one of the only speach browsers out ther that support the LONGDESC > attribute correctly. Anybody else know? > > From what I have heard, pwWebspeak is no longer being supported by the > company that first created it. Again, annicdotally... cna anyone confirm or > deny? > > With my limited experience however, I've been lead to understand that most > visully impaired people actually use screen readers... software programs > which read whatever text elements are on the screen, regardless of whether > it's a web browser, word processor, or similar productivity tool. Jaws > (http://www.freedomscientific.com/index.html) appears to be the front runne; > there's also something call TextAloud > (http://www.nextuptech.com/TextAloud/?AfID=3610), which I have not yet > played with. > > While I won't discourage you to do an alternative text only site, can't you > perhaps work towards ensuring that the actual site is also accessible? > Ultimately less work involved, although perhaps a little more planning... > > Pose questions to the list, that's why it's here > > JF > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-aware-techniques(at)hwg.org > [mailto:owner-aware-techniques(at)hwg.org]On Behalf Of Gail Isbell > Sent: January 23, 2002 4:56 PM > To: aware-techniques(at)hwg.org > Subject: RE: HWG AWARE-TECHNIQUES (was Hello?) > > > Thanks for shaking it up John. I had forgotten about this list, but actually > need it very much at this moment. I am the midst of designing accessible > sites for a couple of customers. I am not sure what direction to take. > > I found a good resource for a talking web browser on the IBM website here: > http://www-3.ibm.com/able/ibmsns.html . I have been using the IBM Home Page > Reader to read web sites. It is amazing how different the sites function > with voice only. It makes you look at the design process differently. You > need to be much more descriptive in the text version. > > I also tested pwWebSpeak ( http://www.soundlinks.com/pwgen.htm ), another > talking browser. This program actually reads some of the html tags. It could > get very confusing for a deaf user. > > At this point, I have decided to do a text only version of the customers web > sites to make it easier for the disabled users to use. I am trying to find > out if the two products above are actually used, or if there are other, more > widely used programs or equipment that disabled people use to operate a > computer and surf the web. > > If anyone has any info I this, I would appreciate it. It is pretty pointless > to design an accessible site if you can't test it in the actual user > environment. Maybe a separate text version isn't necessary. > > Regards, > Gail > > **************************************************************** > Gail Isbell > Oasis Technology > Web Site Design/ Search Engine Positioning > Multimedia CD Presentations > Network/PC Support > gisbell(at)ebusiness-oasis.com > > ************************************************************** > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Foliot - Another 4:00 AM Web Thing" <foliot(at)fouram.com> > To: <aware-techniques(at)hwg.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:31 PM > Subject: Hello? > > > > This appears to be the sleepiest list I've ever subscribed to. What's the > > problem? Are there really no issues, or does nobody but a very small group > > of us actually care? > > > > - Yesterday I received an eMail from the good folk at M*crom*dia (names > > changed to protect the innocent) who have put on a travelling road show to > > demonstrate the accessibility features in a number of their applications > > (both graphic and code tools). Has anyone been to any of these demos in > > their home town? Is it worth investing half a day of dog and pony show? > > Inquiring minds want to know... > > > > - As a Canadian web developer located in Ottawa, Ontario, list members > might > > be interested in the following fact: The Canadian Federal Government has > > mandated all federal web sites be compliant to the Level 1 and Level 2 WAI > > Guidelines, similar to the Section 508 statute in the US, but, to my > > understanding, stricter. Can anybody confirm or deny this fact? > > > > - There is a dire need for developers who are both aware and able to code > to > > these standards... hint<wink>. The Canadian government has provided a > > testing group to assist governmental employees who actually work on > federal > > sites (http://www.cio-dpi.gc.ca/clf-upe/1/wats/wats_e.asp) to help them > > identify and correct potential problems. Attendees consistently ask if > > there are any "real time" support mechanisms out there. I would love to > > recommend this list, but the last posting was dated October 8th, 2001. > > > > So, show of hands... is there anybody out there? > > > > JF > > Ottawa, Ont. > > > > > > > > > >
HWG: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA