RE: Billions across the world in English
by Michel C�t� <michelcote(at)pandore.qc.ca>
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:36:02 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
xs4all |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Le sam, 01 jui 2000, Olav Lavell a =E9crit :
> Hugh Blair wrote
>=20
> > Very interesting thread! I'd like to recap and get consensus
> > if possible.
> > Would others from around the world jump in and comment? Vote your si=
de
> > of the table:
> >
> > US Netherlands
> > UK ? Europe ?
> > Canada ? Asia ?
> > French ? Orient ?
> > (The Americas?)
> > __________________________________________________
> > Thousand 1,000 Thousand
> > Million 1,000,000 Million
> > Billion 1,000,000,000 Milliard
> > Trillion 1,000,000,000,000 Billion
> > Quadrillion 1,000,000,000,000,000 Billiard
> > Quintillion 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 ?
>=20
> Here's my vote. I'm definitely on the *right* side (of above table). Th=
e
> Netherlands need not at all be mentioned as a seperate party, nor does
> Germany as I have seen someone mention, because throughout the world
> *except* the English speaking countries a milliard is *always* understo=
od
> as 1,000,000,000. Also in France, they should most definitely *not* be =
on
> the left (I do not know about the French speaking Canada). The same goe=
s
> for the Spanish and Portuguese speaking Americas.
=09You are quite right Olav, here in Canada milliard in french does mean =
1,000,000,000. It's also the case in France. And it goes million, milli=
ard, billion, billiard, trillion, trilliard etc... I don't think there's=
any real use to go further then billion though.
=09Michel C=F4t=E9
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA