Re: a question of appropriate response
by "Richard and Jolene Johnson" <jonric(at)tx3.net>
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2001 22:54:35 -0700 |
To: |
"Bert Doorn" <bert(at)betterwebdesign.com.au>, <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
cablespeed bert |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
*. Don't tell them they are wrong in using (frames,
tables, midi files, java applets, JavaScript, whatever) but ask if they have
thought about doing it another way (and offer examples).*
*If you have an alternative solution to a technical problem, to
achieve the SAME effect, by all means say so. But if you are stating an
opinion, make that clear.*
Well stated, Bert!
Jolene Johnson
----- Original Message -----
From: Bert Doorn <bert(at)betterwebdesign.com.au>
To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: a question of appropriate response
> G'day
>
> Depends on the circumstances and on how you word your comments/opinions.
My
> approach is to answer the technical question AND where I feel it
necessary,
> offer alternatives. Don't tell them they are wrong in using (frames,
> tables, midi files, java applets, JavaScript, whatever) but ask if they
have
> thought about doing it another way (and offer examples).
>
> > For example, recently somebody asked for general critique of his site. I
> > thought that for what it was, it was nice. However, looking at the
> > source code I noticed that he used frames to build he pages.
>
> In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with frames if they are used
properly.
> No, I am not looking for a debate on frames vs noframes, NN vs IE etc..
> There are many "I hate" clubs out there and everyone has opinions. I hate
> browsers that don't support CSS or that crash my computer. I use the
> monopoly's browser, even though I hate monopolies. There is an
alternative,
> but I hate ads. These ads can be removed, but I hate paying for something
> when I can get a similar tool free of charge. I hate ranting, so I'll
stop
> it right there :-)
>
> As with everything, some people (and organisations) misuse technology.
That
> does not make the technology wrong. I mean, javascript must be bad too,
> since a lot of sites use it to generate annoying, persistent popup boxes
> with advertising. Purists would say that tables are also misused on
almost
> all sites - many people (including yours truly) use them for layout
> purposes, which is not what they were intended for. The list goes on....
>
> To sum up... If you have an alternative solution to a technical problem,
to
> achieve the SAME effect, by all means say so. But if you are stating an
> opinion, make that clear.
>
> Regards
> --
> Bert Doorn, Web Developer
> http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
> Beginners Web Design Tutorial
> http://www.bwdzine.com/bwdt/
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA