Re: MS Office 2000

We have 2000 SB edition because it came with our new workstations. However,
we had '97 prior and comparing the two doesn't bring out any significant
differences other than being Y2K ready with the 2000 version.

Unlike the significant differences between Win95 and 98, unless '97 is not
Y2K ready you might as well save the money and stick to your '97 because the
differences are minimal and upgrading doesn't hold much advantage for you.

Starr Wolf
http://www.starrwolf.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Beauford <beauford(at)sympatico.ca>
To: V Hansen <hansen.nfa.umaine(at)apollo.umenfa.maine.edu>
Cc: HTML Guild <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 1999 7:15 AM
Subject: RE: MS Office 2000


> V Hansen
>
> If you are already using Office 97, then there really isn't much need to
> upgrade to 2000. The differences I have found are mostly cosmetic. This is
> just another scam to pad Bill's pocket - just like Windows 98.
>
> Beauford
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org]  On
Behalf
> Of V Hansen
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 8:13 PM
> To: hwg-basics(at)hwg.org; hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> Subject: OT: MS Office 2000
>
> I'm looking for some info on MS Office 2000 Pro....online articles
> regarding quirks and bugs, etc.  I'm thinking of upgrading, and have
> heard some interesting stories about 2000.  I've searched deja and
> zdnet, and nothing's jumped out to confirm the scary stories.
>
> Thanks.
>
> V

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA