Re: text fot acccessibility
by "Bert" <bert(at)betterwebdesign.com.au>
|
|
Very interesting, Larry
So what it all boils down to is that Netscape 4 is still useful as a
JavaScript debugging tool?
As for plug-ins, I hate them. Most of the time when I come across a site
that won't work without a multiple megabyte download of some plug-in, I
leave. So to me it doesn't matter how or where the plug-ins are stored.
I'm curious about the view-page info. Yes, I have seen it. Just can't
figure out what's so useful about the information it shows. You mentioned
seeing the URLS of frames. I can see the same if I view source in MSIE or
Netscape 6. Or if I launch the MS Script Debugger and look at "running
documents".
Out of curiosity I visited my own (framed) site with Netscape 4.
Information such as last modified, content length, location, security is
nothing new. I can see the same by looking at properties in MSIE. The rest
(local cache file, mime type etc) is useless info (to me).
> When downloading an HTML page, Netscape shows the sizes of the things
> that are being downloaded. I loved this feature - if I saw a 60K item,
Yeah, that's kinda handy. I grant you that. MSIE (6 at least) also shows
how many items are remaining to be loaded. Netscape 6 doesn't but what I do
like about that one is that it tells me how long it took, after the fact.
No need for a stopwatch
> The first capability is enough to ensure that I'll keep N4 around for
> use when debugging JavaScript code even though it's not my main browser.
Yep. Can be handy for that, but I don't use debugging tools for surfing the
web. Especially when they cannot handle valid XHTML and CSS.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Web Developer
CIW Associate, IWA Member
www.betterwebdesign.com.au
Fast Loading, User Friendly Websites
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA