Re: frames compatibility
by "Kate Pollara" <kpollara(at)home.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:49:21 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
gte |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
so does this mean that once you get listed you can add frames pages?
Kate Pollara
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Wilson" <webgooru(at)gte.net>
To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>; "Lori Eldridge" <lorield(at)uswest.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: frames compatibility
> > Could someone please tell me which of the older browsers don't
> > support frames? I'm trying to talk a client out of using them and I
> > need some stats.
>
> Too many to mention, many early browsers were incapable. The real problem
> is with search engine spidering of the website.
>
> Besides making the website a lot more confusing to manage and raising his
> costs, he needs to know that some search engines cannot and will not index
> or spider this websight. See http://www.laisha.com/excite.html for
> background. Excite & Lycos will not index frames. Infoseek has trouble
> with frames. There are probably more.
>
> When we first built our main website, we used frames and had a dickens of
a
> time getting it registered. I found mention of the frames problem and
> converted the website to non-frame and we started showing up almost
> immediatly. Our personal experience shows this is not a myth, we proved
it.
>
> Paul Wilson
> webgooru(at)gte.net
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA