Re: Table alignment problem
by Gregor Pirnaver <gregor.pirnaver(at)email.si>
|
| Date: |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:42:50 +0100 |
| To: |
"Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net> |
| Cc: |
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
| References: |
canopy canopy2 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
On Thursday 01 March 2001 22:32 you wrote:
> If you can write code that works as well in NN 2.x as
> MSIE 5.x how does it make sense not to?
1. Which browsers don't support HTTP 1.1 (virtual hosting)?
2. What parts of transtional HTML don't work in 3+ web=20
browser?
For the record:
HTML 3.2 aims to capture recommended practice as of early=20
'96 and as such to be used as a replacement for HTML 2.0=20
(RFC 1866). Widely deployed rendering attributes are=20
included where they have been shown to be interoperable.=20
SCRIPT and STYLE are included to smooth the introduction of=20
client-side scripts and style sheets. Browsers must avoid=20
showing the contents of these element Otherwise support for=20
them is not required. ID, CLASS and STYLE attributes are=20
not included in this version of HTML. =20
=20
--=20
Gregor @ Mandrake 7.2 -> KDE 2.0 -> Kmail 1.1.99 -> ;-)
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.