Re: Table alignment problem

by Gregor Pirnaver <gregor.pirnaver(at)email.si>

Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:42:50 +0100
To:	"Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
Cc:	hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
References:	canopy canopy2
	todo: View Thread, Original

On Thursday 01 March 2001 22:32 you wrote:
> If you can write code that works as well in NN 2.x as
> MSIE 5.x how does it make sense not to?

1. Which browsers don't support HTTP 1.1 (virtual hosting)?
2. What parts of transtional HTML don't work in 3+ web=20
browser?

For the record:
HTML 3.2 aims to capture recommended practice as of early=20
'96 and as such to be used as a replacement for HTML 2.0=20
(RFC 1866). Widely deployed rendering attributes are=20
included where they have been shown to be interoperable.=20
SCRIPT and STYLE are included to smooth the introduction of=20
client-side scripts and style sheets. Browsers must avoid=20
showing the contents of these element Otherwise support for=20
them is not required. ID, CLASS and STYLE attributes are=20
not included in this version of HTML.                      =20
                                        =20

--=20
Gregor @ Mandrake 7.2 -> KDE 2.0 -> Kmail 1.1.99 -> ;-)

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA